![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I don't know abut others, but my life has never been straight forward, it has always been filled with doubt, hesitations and analysis from many possible angles. A friend once told me that all these things came from being an impulsive and emotional nature at heart, and from being trained at a very young age that these were lesser qualities to have, and since I was also considered fairly intelligent, a close male relative once compared me to a noble metal that was at the same time impure. (he was Polish, and the Poles are prone to categorizing, romanticizing their taxonomy and then trying to excuse it all by a patina of logic, in this process it's probably important to remember that what came first was a knee jerk emotional bias, which started the whole damn thing)
Anyway, I'm always partially ashamed of being slow and introspective when it comes to the big things, the things in which you should be clear and cut cleanly and swiftly with a sharp blade.
It can take me such time to realize why I feel or think a certain way...and it scares me that there may be people out there who are so fast. So very fast, and yet still make the right decisions.
I think a life crisis is just like that when it comes with years, not with particular triggers or blatant happenings. We discover what our subconscious didn't want us to discover, or we see things from angles that we didn't see before and it can be a really heavy experience.
There are certain films and books I come back to when I feel at odds in this particular way, I guess there is a whole collection. They are just there to kickstart certain thoughts or emotions..I could give you a list, probably more impressive than Sense and Sensibility or Persuasion by Austen, but Austen can really take the short cut into this swamp for me.
In Austen stories there are these long silences, in which nothing happens, in which all the pauses are meaningful and in which choices are extremely important and often set in stone once they've been made, so in the rare occasion where a character is given a second chance, it is gently climactic. And everyone and their dog is analyzing everybody's feelings, except the bad guys. That's actually what sets bad and good guys apart in Austen stories, the bad guys never analyze, they just gossip and tend to their own urges without a second thought. And they are swift, their decisions are always very swift, have you noticed that when reading or watching Austen?
Austen's stories always divide people by certain lines, the women for instance, are mostly young with flowing hair and full cheeks, and then you become a matron with one of those white bubbly indoor lady-caps. Children do not count and aren't very interesting in these stories, but the spinsters are, even though there are very few of them and they eventually also get married in the end. The spinsters however, are always portrayed in a thoughtful and many layered way..lingering around thirty, having made many sacrifices and had such abundance of time to think and analyze what went wrong, why and in what way.
The men can be interesting too, except that they are not vulnerable to age in the same way as the women are. They too, often carry lots of emotional baggage with them which is not explained or revealed until pretty far into the novel, which in retrospect explains why they were odd or rude or whathaveyou.
I don't know why I came back to Jane Austen today. It's been a few years I suppose, and I have piles of new, interesting stuff to read or watch, but Austen it was. I've been quite a bit under the weather the whole week, which hasn't been easy while hiking with kids in the foothills.
It was also enlightening to quest-lead a group that was fairly functional and talented, it taught me that in spite of that, I'm still not sure this job is for me in the long run.
There are so many things I should like with the work, and I do truly respect and like the vision of the company...but in the end I'm left feeling pretty hollow and hesitant.
I can do the acting, I can do the paperwork (and lord knows there is plenty), I can do the camp leader bossy thing, I can do the security thing, I can do the physical thing, I can do the role playing rules, I like kids in general...but in the end...I dunnow.
I'm trying to figure it out, maybe the simple truth is that I'm a sissy or something.
One thing that struck me as interesting the other day though, was that I find the pauses in the job, the hardest to endure. The times where I have to pretend camp spirit, where I feel I should be peppy and energetic with kids and adults while not quest leading. It made me understand why I find acting on the stage easier than this.
We'll see what happens. This post is unfocused and maudlin and truly makes me nostalgic for the old days of LJ..when I felt I could write these without shame. Still, for the love of LJ, which I will never leave, unless it's shut down for apocalyptic reasons, I'll start posting in F minor again in this shack.
Anyway, I'm always partially ashamed of being slow and introspective when it comes to the big things, the things in which you should be clear and cut cleanly and swiftly with a sharp blade.
It can take me such time to realize why I feel or think a certain way...and it scares me that there may be people out there who are so fast. So very fast, and yet still make the right decisions.
I think a life crisis is just like that when it comes with years, not with particular triggers or blatant happenings. We discover what our subconscious didn't want us to discover, or we see things from angles that we didn't see before and it can be a really heavy experience.
There are certain films and books I come back to when I feel at odds in this particular way, I guess there is a whole collection. They are just there to kickstart certain thoughts or emotions..I could give you a list, probably more impressive than Sense and Sensibility or Persuasion by Austen, but Austen can really take the short cut into this swamp for me.
In Austen stories there are these long silences, in which nothing happens, in which all the pauses are meaningful and in which choices are extremely important and often set in stone once they've been made, so in the rare occasion where a character is given a second chance, it is gently climactic. And everyone and their dog is analyzing everybody's feelings, except the bad guys. That's actually what sets bad and good guys apart in Austen stories, the bad guys never analyze, they just gossip and tend to their own urges without a second thought. And they are swift, their decisions are always very swift, have you noticed that when reading or watching Austen?
Austen's stories always divide people by certain lines, the women for instance, are mostly young with flowing hair and full cheeks, and then you become a matron with one of those white bubbly indoor lady-caps. Children do not count and aren't very interesting in these stories, but the spinsters are, even though there are very few of them and they eventually also get married in the end. The spinsters however, are always portrayed in a thoughtful and many layered way..lingering around thirty, having made many sacrifices and had such abundance of time to think and analyze what went wrong, why and in what way.
The men can be interesting too, except that they are not vulnerable to age in the same way as the women are. They too, often carry lots of emotional baggage with them which is not explained or revealed until pretty far into the novel, which in retrospect explains why they were odd or rude or whathaveyou.
I don't know why I came back to Jane Austen today. It's been a few years I suppose, and I have piles of new, interesting stuff to read or watch, but Austen it was. I've been quite a bit under the weather the whole week, which hasn't been easy while hiking with kids in the foothills.
It was also enlightening to quest-lead a group that was fairly functional and talented, it taught me that in spite of that, I'm still not sure this job is for me in the long run.
There are so many things I should like with the work, and I do truly respect and like the vision of the company...but in the end I'm left feeling pretty hollow and hesitant.
I can do the acting, I can do the paperwork (and lord knows there is plenty), I can do the camp leader bossy thing, I can do the security thing, I can do the physical thing, I can do the role playing rules, I like kids in general...but in the end...I dunnow.
I'm trying to figure it out, maybe the simple truth is that I'm a sissy or something.
One thing that struck me as interesting the other day though, was that I find the pauses in the job, the hardest to endure. The times where I have to pretend camp spirit, where I feel I should be peppy and energetic with kids and adults while not quest leading. It made me understand why I find acting on the stage easier than this.
We'll see what happens. This post is unfocused and maudlin and truly makes me nostalgic for the old days of LJ..when I felt I could write these without shame. Still, for the love of LJ, which I will never leave, unless it's shut down for apocalyptic reasons, I'll start posting in F minor again in this shack.
I like all your songs
Date: 2009-07-10 10:23 pm (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hIlddMExDNI
completely likewise
Date: 2009-07-10 10:30 pm (UTC)Woody Guthrie, Billy Bragg, Wilco, Me and You
Date: 2009-07-10 10:35 pm (UTC)Ride it out sister. Write it out.
Re: Woody Guthrie, Billy Bragg, Wilco, Me and You
Date: 2009-07-10 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 10:42 pm (UTC)I haven't started the zombie one yet
Date: 2009-07-10 10:47 pm (UTC)Re: I haven't started the zombie one yet
Date: 2009-07-10 11:05 pm (UTC)I have my happy movies and such... I haven't reread a book since I was a little kid. Something about it just stopped working for me for some reason. Even if I miss some characters like they're old friends, I feel the need for it to be new, I guess. I recently started rereading some books I had really loved back when I was in high school, and they just don't have the same magic anymore.
looking forward to be book bitching with you again
Date: 2009-07-10 11:13 pm (UTC)For me, Austen triggers a certain form of melancholic/hopeful reflection, it's not happy, just an aesthetically pleasing way of re-hashing old brain foods.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 03:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 10:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 11:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 11:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 11:17 pm (UTC)(and the BBC 7 hour version of P&P from the 90's, not the film with Kiera)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-10 11:46 pm (UTC)It cannot be explained, it has to be seen!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 12:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 04:11 pm (UTC)I refuse to watch the new Pride and Prejudice, because... just because bleh. But then my problem with the '90s BBC version is that the actress playing Elizabeth is soooo much prettier than the one portraying Jane — which wouldn't matter in any plot that didn't so continually emphasize how much prettier Jane is supposed to be to compensate for her blandness. Aaaarhghghgh.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 04:57 pm (UTC)(yeah, I think Lizzy is prettier than Jane in the BBC show as well, although I don't have any particular beef with Jane)
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 02:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 02:29 am (UTC)Although, 3 people have quit this summer, so it is a tough job I suppose...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 12:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 05:50 am (UTC)oh baby. i am so in this camp.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 03:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-11 08:11 pm (UTC)I am not that in control, all i can do is decide and make it work regardless.
Does that make sense? So I usually go with my gut after weighing out options.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 03:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 03:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-12 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 12:59 pm (UTC)I do have to wonder if it was that unpleasant experience with the initial training that shut you down to and walled you off from any good coming from the job. Just a thought.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-13 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 08:14 pm (UTC)I've ever read any Austen. I read some Bronte,
though. Does that count?
I just watched the Sense & Sensibility with
Thompson, Rickman, and Winslet, and liked
it well enough. But I *did* feel that Mar-
garet got short shrift in the whole story.
I think I liked her character the most, and
was disappointed that she didn't get to goto
London.
I also watched the Emma with Paltrow a month
or two ago, and didn't feel much one way or
the other about it, except that Emma was kind
of a self-centred idiot.
What's wrong with the job? Simply too tiring?
Too much outside? Are you too much a creature
of archives and stacks and computer screens
and dimly lit rooms, only venturing outside
for *fun*, as opposed to work?
As much as I loathe children, I kind of think
I'd like your outdoorsy job -- if my health were
way better than it's been since I was sixteen.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 11:24 pm (UTC)..I like the outdoorsiness of the job, and I actually like quest-leading quite a bit..but the rest..the paperwork (blech!), being campy and social with games and camp-leading shit (in between questing)..that takes its toll on me. I think..on evaluation, that I can successfully be a performer, but that I suck at being a complete extrovert between those situations, and on top of that I'm very self critical, which is a pretty hard combo.
I've managed the job fairly well, but I can't do many other things afterward, I'm just too gassed, mentally moreso than physically.
I'm still grateful to have it, it has taught me a lot about grownups, kids and myself. I'll still work for them now and again, we'll just see how much.